<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First 100K concurrent user ECM benchmark</title>
	<atom:link href="http://craigrandall.net/archives/2009/04/1st-100k-usr-bnchmrk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://craigrandall.net/archives/2009/04/1st-100k-usr-bnchmrk/</link>
	<description>Thoughts about software architecture, books and life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 18:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SQL Server, BizTalk Server, le 64 bits et au-delà !... : benchmark 100 000 utilisateurs Documentum avec SQL Server 2008 !</title>
		<link>http://craigrandall.net/archives/2009/04/1st-100k-usr-bnchmrk/comment-page-1/#comment-20788</link>
		<dc:creator>SQL Server, BizTalk Server, le 64 bits et au-delà !... : benchmark 100 000 utilisateurs Documentum avec SQL Server 2008 !</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 08:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://craigrandall.net/?p=1002#comment-20788</guid>
		<description>[...] détails ici : http://craigrandall.net/archives/2009/04/1st-100k-usr-bnchmrk/&#160;  Filed under: _ Francais / French, _ English / Anglais, Windows 64bits, Mat&#233;riels / [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] détails ici : <a href="http://craigrandall.net/archives/2009/04/1st-100k-usr-bnchmrk/&#038;#160" rel="nofollow">http://craigrandall.net/archives/2009/04/1st-100k-usr-bnchmrk/&#038;#160</a>;  Filed under: _ Francais / French, _ English / Anglais, Windows 64bits, Mat&#233;riels / [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Randall</title>
		<link>http://craigrandall.net/archives/2009/04/1st-100k-usr-bnchmrk/comment-page-1/#comment-20778</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Randall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 05:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://craigrandall.net/?p=1002#comment-20778</guid>
		<description>Hey, HP. It feels great! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, HP. It feels great! <img src='http://craigrandall.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hey EMC – how’s it feel to run a 100,000 user benchmark? - LoadRunner at HP</title>
		<link>http://craigrandall.net/archives/2009/04/1st-100k-usr-bnchmrk/comment-page-1/#comment-20777</link>
		<dc:creator>Hey EMC – how’s it feel to run a 100,000 user benchmark? - LoadRunner at HP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 04:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://craigrandall.net/?p=1002#comment-20777</guid>
		<description>[...] The surprising thing to us was the LoadRunner Controller performance on the latest HP commodity hardware. It did really well at running 50k vusers and probably more than that if we had more memory. Also, when you consider the whole system they were testing it didn’t take much hardware at all to deliver sub-second performance for 100k user load. And don’t forget – the database was SQL Server 2008, the latest release from Microsoft. You can see a picture of the 64 CPU’s on the SQL database Craig’s blog. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The surprising thing to us was the LoadRunner Controller performance on the latest HP commodity hardware. It did really well at running 50k vusers and probably more than that if we had more memory. Also, when you consider the whole system they were testing it didn’t take much hardware at all to deliver sub-second performance for 100k user load. And don’t forget – the database was SQL Server 2008, the latest release from Microsoft. You can see a picture of the 64 CPU’s on the SQL database Craig’s blog. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

