<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikinomics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://craigrandall.net/archives/2007/08/wikinomics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://craigrandall.net/archives/2007/08/wikinomics/</link>
	<description>Thoughts about software architecture, books and life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 18:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Document collaboration - questions</title>
		<link>http://craigrandall.net/archives/2007/08/wikinomics/comment-page-1/#comment-20498</link>
		<dc:creator>Document collaboration - questions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 01:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://craigrandall.net/archives/2007/08/wikinomics/#comment-20498</guid>
		<description>[...] RSS &#8592; Wikinomics [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] RSS &larr; Wikinomics [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wikify Documentum already</title>
		<link>http://craigrandall.net/archives/2007/08/wikinomics/comment-page-1/#comment-20452</link>
		<dc:creator>Wikify Documentum already</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 06:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://craigrandall.net/archives/2007/08/wikinomics/#comment-20452</guid>
		<description>[...] few months ago, I blogged about this thought-provoking book. Around the same time I began to promote the idea of taking [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] few months ago, I blogged about this thought-provoking book. Around the same time I began to promote the idea of taking [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pie</title>
		<link>http://craigrandall.net/archives/2007/08/wikinomics/comment-page-1/#comment-20272</link>
		<dc:creator>Pie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 14:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://craigrandall.net/archives/2007/08/wikinomics/#comment-20272</guid>
		<description>Just wanted to weigh in here as well.  Having the forums outside should increase involvement in the forums.  It may also help lead to the formation of alternative resources like a Wiki.  Alfresco has one, why can&#039;t we?

The easier Documentum is to use, implement, and integrate, the more we can focus on the strategic aspect of ECM and less on &quot;how do I get it to do this?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to weigh in here as well.  Having the forums outside should increase involvement in the forums.  It may also help lead to the formation of alternative resources like a Wiki.  Alfresco has one, why can&#8217;t we?</p>
<p>The easier Documentum is to use, implement, and integrate, the more we can focus on the strategic aspect of ECM and less on &#8220;how do I get it to do this?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Randall</title>
		<link>http://craigrandall.net/archives/2007/08/wikinomics/comment-page-1/#comment-20271</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Randall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 03:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://craigrandall.net/archives/2007/08/wikinomics/#comment-20271</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Fabian, for providing such a clear example of an opportunity to embrace cocreation. To me, this thread is a no-brainer: Documentum forums should become open. You&#039;ve articulated &quot;why&quot; quite well in the above forum thread, too. Open forums--in general, not just for support--represent a win for all involved, EMC, its partners, its customers, its development community, consultants, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Fabian, for providing such a clear example of an opportunity to embrace cocreation. To me, this thread is a no-brainer: Documentum forums should become open. You&#8217;ve articulated &#8220;why&#8221; quite well in the above forum thread, too. Open forums&#8211;in general, not just for support&#8211;represent a win for all involved, EMC, its partners, its customers, its development community, consultants, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flee999</title>
		<link>http://craigrandall.net/archives/2007/08/wikinomics/comment-page-1/#comment-20270</link>
		<dc:creator>flee999</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 16:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://craigrandall.net/archives/2007/08/wikinomics/#comment-20270</guid>
		<description>Craig, there has been talk on the DCTM support forums about bringing the boards outside of PowerLink (much like the &lt;a title=&quot;VMware Technology Network Forums Home&quot; href=&quot;http://www.vmware.com/community/&quot; target=&quot;_new&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;VMware forums&lt;/a&gt;) so that the world at large can benefit and contribute to this this information and its use.  

https://forums.emc.com/nsepn/webapps/xpsgggfs31465mnldcpq14543562/&lt;br /&gt;forums/thread.jspa?threadID=57659 (&lt;strong&gt;URL is all-one-line&lt;/strong&gt;; requires PowerLink registration)

I think the boards are a prime example of the type of information begging to be freed from a legacy view of information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Craig, there has been talk on the DCTM support forums about bringing the boards outside of PowerLink (much like the <a title="VMware Technology Network Forums Home" href="http://www.vmware.com/community/" target="_new" rel="nofollow">VMware forums</a>) so that the world at large can benefit and contribute to this this information and its use.  </p>
<p><a href="https://forums.emc.com/nsepn/webapps/xpsgggfs31465mnldcpq14543562/" rel="nofollow">https://forums.emc.com/nsepn/webapps/xpsgggfs31465mnldcpq14543562/</a><br />forums/thread.jspa?threadID=57659 (<strong>URL is all-one-line</strong>; requires PowerLink registration)</p>
<p>I think the boards are a prime example of the type of information begging to be freed from a legacy view of information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

