Comments on: Standards and ECM http://craigrandall.net/archives/2007/06/standards-and-ecm/ Thoughts about software architecture, books and life Wed, 04 Jan 2012 18:00:35 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: CMIS - Content Management Interoperability Services | Craig's Musings http://craigrandall.net/archives/2007/06/standards-and-ecm/comment-page-1/#comment-20584 CMIS - Content Management Interoperability Services | Craig's Musings Wed, 10 Sep 2008 14:23:51 +0000 http://craigrandall.net/archives/2007/06/standards-and-ecm/#comment-20584 [...] standards, admittedly (and out of legal obligation) at a high-level–followed up one year ago, here. So, finally, all can become [...] [...] standards, admittedly (and out of legal obligation) at a high-level–followed up one year ago, here. So, finally, all can become [...]

]]> By: Choosing a Target for Standards « Word of Pie http://craigrandall.net/archives/2007/06/standards-and-ecm/comment-page-1/#comment-19853 Choosing a Target for Standards « Word of Pie Mon, 02 Jul 2007 19:01:04 +0000 http://craigrandall.net/archives/2007/06/standards-and-ecm/#comment-19853 [...] appears to be the approach to standards that EMC is taking with D6. The new Documentum Foundation Services is providing baseline services. [...] [...] appears to be the approach to standards that EMC is taking with D6. The new Documentum Foundation Services is providing baseline services. [...]

]]> By: Craig Randall http://craigrandall.net/archives/2007/06/standards-and-ecm/comment-page-1/#comment-19836 Craig Randall Mon, 02 Jul 2007 04:44:13 +0000 http://craigrandall.net/archives/2007/06/standards-and-ecm/#comment-19836 I know the folks from EMC involved with JCR (i.e. JSR-170 and JSR-283)--"change from within" was certainly pursued. However, JCR is not about true interoperability (e.g. platform and language agnostic); it's about a Java API to content repositories. I am working directly on ECM standardization for EMC with other colleagues; so, yes, I have a good idea about what is forthcoming. ;-) But as I said above, I can't say more just yet. Please stay tuned and thanks for your interest, Fabian. I know the folks from EMC involved with JCR (i.e. JSR-170 and JSR-283)–”change from within” was certainly pursued. However, JCR is not about true interoperability (e.g. platform and language agnostic); it’s about a Java API to content repositories.

I am working directly on ECM standardization for EMC with other colleagues; so, yes, I have a good idea about what is forthcoming. ;-) But as I said above, I can’t say more just yet. Please stay tuned and thanks for your interest, Fabian.

]]> By: flee999 http://craigrandall.net/archives/2007/06/standards-and-ecm/comment-page-1/#comment-19834 flee999 Mon, 02 Jul 2007 03:48:19 +0000 http://craigrandall.net/archives/2007/06/standards-and-ecm/#comment-19834 Hi Craig, Thanks for the great post. We heard at Momentum that Documentum was pulling out of the JSR-170 committee (or at least was going to end its active involvement). If DCTM feels that the other JSR-170 members were going in the wrong direction, I think I would have rather seen them try to change it from within...reading between the lines it sounded like DCTM was going to back another standard. Any idea what that may be? Hi Craig, Thanks for the great post. We heard at Momentum that Documentum was pulling out of the JSR-170 committee (or at least was going to end its active involvement).

If DCTM feels that the other JSR-170 members were going in the wrong direction, I think I would have rather seen them try to change it from within…reading between the lines it sounded like DCTM was going to back another standard. Any idea what that may be?

]]>